Clive Corcoran

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

Bill Gross of PIMCO has suggested that we may be facing a new economic environment where the ground rules have changed sufficiently that previous benchmarks for applying valuations for equities no longer apply. In other words don't count on a new bull market in stocks any time soon.

"Stocks are cheap when valued within the context of a financed-based economy once dominated by leverage, cheap financing and even lower corporate tax rates,” Pacific Investment Management Co.’s Gross wrote in a market commentary posted on the company’s Web site. “That world, however, is in our past not our future."

It has proven to be hazardous to embrace the notion that this time it will be different. Usually this argument is used to support bubbles that have developed and which are ultimately unsustainable, but which can be kept inflated for one last expansionary phase by the suggestion that a paradigm shift has taken place, and that underlying market conditions are so transformed that previously held grounds for investor caution can be cast aside.

A classic recent example of this was the notion that dot com companies in the late 90s were examples of a New Economy in which new metrics were relied upon, rather than stuffy notions like revenue and earnings, to prop up the massive bubble that allowed companies with zero sales to command billion dollar market capitalizations.

Even more insidious was the suggestion that one of the alleged bonuses of financially engineered securities was that risk had been distributed more widely and that the incentives/premium that should be required to reward investors in a broad range of asset backed securities could be re-priced downwards. The fallacy of this bogus argument is now widely recognized and is in large part what has created the current financial crisis.

Returning to Bill Gross's comments, he probably is right to conclude that it is becoming harder with each new bailout and government moving of the goal posts of the market mechanisms that still remain, to champion a full blown revival case for equities. To assume that it is just a matter of time before a renewed bull market vigor will return to inspire asset allocators to commit funds on the long side to the stock market and that this will enable previously successful business models, in financial services for example, to flourish again, seems like wild eyed optimism.

I would suggest that Mr. Gross should also be concerned that the ground rules are also being dramatically changed in that part of the capital markets that he is most focused upon; it could be different for government debt investors this time as we are moving into uncharted territory.

How can we be sure that sovereign debt will continue to be supported in the international capital markets?

The US government has the benefit that the dollar is still the world's reserve currency but the amount of Treasury paper that has to be digested by the markets in the coming years is staggering. Even if international investors, pension funds and insurance companies continue to support the US Treasury market, which is not a given, the fact that so many other sovereign credits will be competing for the world's limited savings suggests that there just could be a major casualty along the way. Just to focus on the UK for one moment, total public debt is expected to more than double in the next three years and this will require the issuance of hundreds of billions of pounds of new gilts. Sterling is already exploring new lows against major currencies, and the credit default swap market shows that the credit rating of the UK government is falling off rapidly.

If savers were to begin to doubt that the full faith and credit of a sovereign borrower can be totally relied upon, as is now being hinted at by the increasing insurance rates in credit default swaps, then the sovereign debt edifice that Mr. Gross and other risk averse asset allocators are currently supporting could prove to be yet another house of cards.

Disclosure: no positions

This article has 1 comment:

  •  
    Speaking of Britain and global currency pegging, the U.S. seems to be repeating Britain's past when it lost it's 1st position of international monetary peg. About this part of the article:

    "To assume that it is just a matter of time before a renewed bull market vigor will return to inspire asset allocators to commit funds on the long side to the stock market and that this will enable previously successful business models, in financial services for example, to flourish again, seems like wild eyed optimism."

    Nope. It's all a question of when and my guess is 2013 for the next U.S. bull market. Major geopolitics events such as war or WMD terrorist event anywhere in the Western World is the wild card that could disrupt my prediction.
    Reply | Link to Comment
Top Rated Comment Streams:

Numbers are net rating-

See all Top 100 »

Articles on related themes