China A-Share/H-Share Premium Reaches Epic Proportions
The Chinese stock market always has had a split personality. Lately, it has been getting even worse.
The Hang Seng China AH Premium Index, which measures the spread between the A-shares and H-shares of dual-listed companies domiciled in mainland China, is showing some real friskiness in early 2008.
Although it closed out January 2 at 180.37, by midmonth it had closed above 200 (at 201.11) for the first time. It hit a peak the next day to finish at 208.06 before dropping to a final 195.05 on January 17. There was a third close above 200 (206.78 on January 22), but as of January 29 it had fallen to just below the 180 mark.
Essentially, what this means is that the A-shares as a group are currently trading at a premium of about 80% over the H-shares and that at one point they were trading at a premium of more than 100%—or more than double the price of the H-shares.
For those unfamiliar with China's markets, A-shares are shares of stock in mainland companies that are listed on mainland exchanges and are largely available only to domestic investors. H-shares are shares of stock in mainland companies that are listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange; they are available mainly to nonmainland investors. Some mainland companies have both A-shares and H-shares trading, and Hang Seng Indexes created the Hang Seng China AH Premium Index to measure the spread between those shares.
While both H-shares and A-shares have risen dramatically with China's economic boom, the A-shares market has risen more sharply as domestic investors—with newfound investable wealth and extensive restrictions on foreign investment—have flooded the mainland exchanges with assets, driving up stock prices and creating an impressive bubble.
Perhaps the strangest thing is that, as the Hang Seng China AH Premium index was crossing over a milestone, both the Hang Seng AH [A] Index and the Hang Seng AH [H] Index were on losing streaks—it was just that the H-shares index were experiencing a steeper decline.
The day the premium index closed above 200, the A-shares index was down just 1.63% compared with a 2.82% decline for the H-shares index. The next day (January 16) the premium index closed above 208, but the A-shares index and the H-shares index fell 3.41% and 6.41%, respectively. When the premium index hit 206 a few days later, the A-shares index was down just 7.62% versus an 11.37% decline for the H-shares index.
So what's going on in Hong Kong?
Well, for one thing the local market is experiencing a great deal of what Hong Kong Monetary Authority Chief Executive Joseph Yam termed "turbulence." Concerns about the U.S. economy, particularly the subprime mortgage crisis, have repeatedly roiled markets, and matters have not been helped by rumors swirling around China's sidelined "through-train" program that would let mainland investors invest in Hong Kong's stock market.
Although the plan has been indefinitely postponed, rumors rose and then were quashed that China might soon put it into effect—which no doubt contributed to the chaos.
While mainland China is known for its volatility, as a closed market it likely reacts less to what is going on in foreign markets. Hong Kong, however, is a highly developed stock market with strong international ties. It seems likely it would have a stronger reaction to foreign events.
Written by Heather Bell
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Freddie/Fannie Plans In Motion; Why Are They Being Underplayed?
- Hedge Funds Are Getting Their Butts Kicked Too
- Energy Independence: It's About Demand, Not Supply
- Housing Prices: Bottom or Temporary Bear Break?
- McCainomics: What Can He Do?
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Sarah Palin: Wall Street's Candidate »
- Potash Corp. Update: Time To Buy? »
- Apple: Steve and I Have Been Wrong »
- Precious Metals Manipulation: Lawyers Prepare for Battle »
- The Chinese Oil Problem »
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings »
- Wells Fargo Sham Revealed »
- Guru Picks: Five Blue Chips »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Fannie & Freddie Bailout? - Fast Money Recap (9/5/08)
- Unconventional Energy Still Attractive - UBS
- Red Hat / Qumranet Deal Adds Fuel to the Virtualization Fire
- ETF Pick of the Week: iShares MSCI Netherlands
- Altria's Last Legal Hurdle Should Be Settled This Fall
- How Wal-Mart Really Beats Expectations
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap
- Leucadia's Key to Success
- China Natural Gas: Growth Appears Certain
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Energy Conversion Devices: Ridiculously High Valuation
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Fed Should Cut Rates - Cramer's Mad Money (9/5/08)
- Bullish on Wachovia - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/5/08)
- Worst Downgrades - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/5/08)
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »







This article has 1 comment:
Schweitzer