Activists Turn Up the Heat - But Can They Save Circuit City?
Activist investors are turning up the heat on Phil Schoonover and company, noting that Circuit City's (CC) management is touting a $200 million cost initiative as a success even though it cost the company $500 million in gross profits.
From the WSJ:
Calling Circuit City Stores Inc.'s turnaround efforts "disastrous," Wattles Capital Management LLC sent a letter to the retailer's board reiterating its desire that Chairman and Chief Executive Philip Schoonover be ousted.
The move is a sign the proxy battle between the shareholder group -- which holds a 6.5% stake in Circuit City -- and the consumer-electronics giant is heating up. Wattles already has nominated a slate of five directors for election at the annual meeting…
…Wattles said Mr. Schoonover and his senior management team appear to have focused on cost-cutting measures with little or no consideration for their negative impact on revenue and gross profit, referring to the company's year-ago layoff of 3,400 workers. To much criticism, Circuit City replaced them with lower-paid staff.
Wattles said the company "has repeatedly touted the fact that they have cut $200 million of annualized selling, general and administrative expenses while ignoring the fact that approximately $500 million of gross profit has been wiped-out in the process."
When I consider the short-sightedness involved in over focusing on short-term cost cutting to the detriment of medium to long term profits, the obvious disconnect with the consumer and inability to make money in a hot market, I can’t see this company surviving without a change in management.
The most glaring indictment of CC’s management team was that they were originally brought in to turnaround a struggling company, and done nothing more but to make things worse. A new management team would have to effectively “catch-up” by bringing Circuit City back to the point it was at prior to Mr. Schoonover’s tenure, and then start to fix the company’s original problems.
The fact that activists have to get involved in order to effect a management change is kind of ridiculous when you consider the company’s performance as of late; Circuit City was actually making money before the so called “turn around” process started. Why is the board sitting silently by while the company is run into the ground?
If Phil is given the sack and a new management team is installed, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a quick upsurge in the company’s stock. However, I’m not sure the surge would be sustainable, as it’s unknown (at this point) if an effective management team will be installed that not only understands CC’s problems but can develop effective solutions for them. Ousting the current management team is just the tip of the iceberg; the real challenge will be selecting a management team that is up to the task of saving Circuit City.
The million dollar question is whether or not Circuit City turnaround 2.0 will fare better than the current one, as the new managers will have a tougher job ahead of them did Mr. Schoonover and company did.
Sources:
The Wall St. Journal: “Circuit City Critic Stirs It Up” – Donna Kardos, April 3, 2008.
Disclosure: at the time of publishing the author didn’t own a position in Circuit City.
Related Articles
|
Top Rated Comment Streams:
-
1.Hedged In662
- 2.
-
3.Smarty_Pants425
-
4.axelrod608331
-
5.Chris B279



This article has 5 comments:
-
deaverb
-
129 Comments
My Website
Apr 04 10:08 AM-
ballsschweaty
-
99 Comments
Apr 04 10:23 AMIf Wattles is successful in ousting the CC CEO, I will short the hell out of the stock. Wattles doesn't know how to operate a retail chain and his ego knows no bounds.
-
gator
-
1 Comment
Apr 04 10:58 AMreal question is can anybody save it ? And if not, what's the best path for shareholders and employees going forward ? Most likely, it's sale to a buyer who can leverage Circuit City's best assets: Internet, service, and real estate. Maybe Radio Shack.
But a third rate failed retail con man like Wattles will add nothing.
-
Eric Fromm
-
2 Comments
Apr 04 12:09 PMClearly a change of management with a sense of committment to turning the ship around would be a positive, but is it enough? I think they have run the galleon aground. Unfortunately Best Buy and Walmart are lobbing shots over the bow while she rests aground. Skull and cross bones, skull and cross bones I see.
-
Eric Fromm
-
2 Comments
Apr 04 12:16 PM