SA Editor
Judy Weil

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

Quotes of the Day

“You hear a lot about foreclosure and the thousands of families who are being forced out. But that is swamped by the number of people who want to sell their homes and can’t.” - Joseph S. Tracy, director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. (NY Times, Apr. 3rd)

"Homeowners that were in this crisis felt it first. It became a problem for the city when we saw our homes vacant. - "When Wall Street started feeling it, it became a problem for the federal government. This cycle now is coming for the school budgets." - Douglas Palmer, mayor of Trenton, N.J. (Forbes, Apr. 2nd)

Macro

Unsold Homes Tie Down Would-Be Transplants. “Mobility opens up job opportunities… When housing is not an obstacle, more than five million men and women, nearly 4% of the nation’s work force, move annually from one place to another — to a new job after a layoff, or to higher-paying work… Now, unable to sell their homes… tens of thousands of people… are making the labor force less flexible just as a weakening economy puts pressure on workers to move to wherever companies are still hiring… Census Bureau: In a booming [housing] market, interstate migration reached 2.2 million people in 2006… In 2007, interstate migration plunged to 1.6 million people.” (NY Times, Apr. 3rd)

Still The Dream. David Frum, an author and American Enterprise Institute resident scholar: The recent meltdown in the subprime mortgage market is evidence that owning a home might not be the best thing for lower-income Americans. Owning a home makes it hard for poorer people to move to find better jobs... Maintenance expenses are too unpredictable for the badly off. They can lose their shirts… if they can't make their mortgage payments, while a renter is merely evicted. "Maybe we should also question the great American home ownership ideal for middle-class people as well,” Frum added.” (Chron.com, Apr. 3rd)

A Subprime Schooling. “Add another group to those feeling the impact of the U.S. subprime mortgage meltdown: students and educators. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 28% of funding for America's public schools comes from local property tax. Property tax revenues, which in many areas of the country had grown along with property values, are poised to remain flat or even shrink in coming years… The U.S. Conference of Mayors [has] projected nationwide decline of $1.2 trillion in home values… California, alone, stood to lose tax revenue of $6.6 billion--more than any other state.” (Forbes, Apr. 2nd)

Sawdust Prices Soar As Supply Dwindles With Housing Downturn. “From Maine to Oregon, the price of sawdust, along with other wood byproducts, has soared. When they can find it, sawdust buyers - dairy farmers, particleboard makers and others - are paying up to $50/ton or more, double what they paid a year ago, some say… In Q1’08, U.S. sawmills have been shipping about 114 million board feet of lumber per day, said Henry Spelter, an economist with the U.S. Forest Service forest products laboratory in Madison, Wisconsin. That's down from 135 million-bf/day in Q1’07, and 160 million board feet in 2006.” (Canadian Press, Apr. 2nd)

Looking Way, Way Over The Valley With Housing Stocks. “A glimmer of hope: A government report on construction spending in February said outlays for private residential construction spending dropped 0.9% in the month from January, a smaller-than-expected decline. The drop in January was 1.9%... Peter Kretzmer, Bank of America economist: The overall decline in residential construction spending in February was muted by a 5.1% surge in remodeling expenditures. By contrast, “new single-family building fell a large 5.7% in the month, suggesting that the glut of homes on the market continues to suppress construction.” (LA Times, Apr. 1st)

Food Stamp Use at Record Pace as Jobs Vanish. “The number of Americans receiving food stamps is projected to reach 28 million in the coming year, the highest level since the aid program began in the 1960s… Recent rises in many states appear to be resulting mainly from the economic slowdown, officials and experts say… The Congressional Budget Office projects a continued increase in the monthly number of recipients in the next fiscal year, starting Oct. 1 — to 28 million, up from 27.8 million in 2008, and 26.5 million in 2007… Federal benefit costs are projected to rise to $36 billion in the 2009 fiscal year from $34 billion this year… In Michigan, one in eight residents now receives food stamps.” (NY Times, Mar. 31st)

Dear Readers: Read anything you liked on this subject and didn't see it here? Why not post a link or a quote from the article in our comments section. Share the wealth! - Ed.

Get Seeking Alpha's housing market coverage by email -- it's free and takes only seconds to sign up.

This article has 4 comments:

  •  
    Apr 04 12:07 PM
    I believe housing is in a SECULAR decline for the next 10-12 years as the Baby Boomers age through the system and there are far fewer Gen X'rs to buy their homes. This is not a CYCLICAL downturn that will turn around anytime soon. We are entering a LONG period of to many would be sellers and too few capable buyers. Housing is a real generational problem
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Apr 04 12:33 PM
    How about the non homeowners who want to buy a home but can't because they're above 2.5x income? Even as a top 20% income earner, this doesn't get you a condo nevermind a house near any coastal city. Is anyone born after 1979 just plain SOL when it comes to talk of keeping prices high with the hand of the government?

    >“You hear a lot about foreclosure and the thousands of families who are being forced out. But that is swamped by the number of people who want to sell their homes and can’t.” - Joseph S. Tracy, director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Apr 04 07:26 PM
    Low income housing is another social experiment brought to you by the U.S. government,co-opted by greedy mortgage brokers,investment bankers,developers and "flippers",r... in the hothouse of lax regulation from aforementioned gummint.It will in the long run,and YES,it will be a long run,hurt those it was supposed to help (the poor),the most.
    Reply | Link to Comment
  •  
    Apr 05 11:10 AM
    I find it interesting that commentators like Cramer are suggesting that the government buy and then bulldoze foreclosed houses in order to prop up the housing market by reducing supply. That kind of thinking which helps the wall street mortgage securities prices but kills home affordability is just plain nuts. I'm sure some of our politicians will be proposing it soon however.
    Reply | Link to Comment
Top Rated Comment Streams:

Numbers are net rating-

See all Top 100 »
More by SA Editor Judy Weil

Articles on related themes