Finding Relative Value in Financial Services
Not every financial services sector company is a basket case destined for bankruptcy. There are many well-run lower risk organizations in the bunch. Moreover, let's not blame the banking model for individual companies' woes. The Economist had a good article this weekend highlighting the fact that it is not the universal banking model which is to blame for large writedowns at the likes of UBS (UBS) and Citigroup (C).
Yet, tempting as it is to believe that changing business models would solve UBS’s problems, or those of the wider industry, the evidence of the credit crisis suggests otherwise. No single model has emerged from the turmoil either wholly vindicated or entirely discredited. Credit Suisse shares a city square in Zurich and a business strategy with UBS, but has come through the past 12 months in much better shape and continues to attract money into its wealth-management division. Citigroup’s version of the universal-banking model is one where it walks into every punch going; Britain’s HSBC has been more successful in blunting the impact of its American misadventures through decent earnings in emerging markets. Of the Wall Street investment banks, Goldman Sachs has survived with its reputation enhanced. Bear Stearns did not survive at all. Pure retail banks can blow up too: Northern Rock, which was nationalised by the British government after a humiliating run on it, had a simple enough product line.
-No size fits all, Economist, 14 Aug 2008
While it is not a sure bet that Credit Suisse (CS), Goldman (GS) and HSBC (HBC) will continue to outperform their peers, it should be obvious that there are extreme differences in the risk profiles of different financial institutions n the same line of business.
Enormous losses were not a given for financial services companies. Those organizations with the greatest losses are the ones who took the largest risk. Their risk play has not paid off and they are reaping the consequences. Losses in the financial services sector are a direct result of individual institutions succumbing to the pressure for sustained profits in a low-return environment and making large bets on riskier assets just when the housing bubble burst.
Other companies in the same sectors avoided these risks.
This got me to thinking about relative value plays in the financials. In that vein, let me suggest some financial institution relative value plays:
- Large US Banks: Wells Fargo (WFC) over Citigroup
- Large US Banks: US Bancorp (USB) over JP Morgan Chase (JPM)
- Large US Banks: Bank of New York Mellon (BK) over Bank of America (BAC)
- Large US Regional Banks: SunTrust (STI) over Wachovia (WB)
- Large US Regional Banks: M&T Bank (MTB) over Washington Mutual (WM)
- Britain: Lloyds (LYG) over HBOS
- Switzerland: Credit Suisse over UBS
- Canada: Scotiabank (BNS) over CIBC
- Germany: Commerzbank (CRZBY.PK) over Deutsche Bank (DB)
- Investment Banking: Goldman Sachs over Merrill Lynch (MER)
- Property and Casualty Insurance: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) (BRK.B) over AIG (AIG)
Why would you own the list of second names when you can own the first? Bottom-fishing is the only plausible reason I can come up with. But, in this credit crisis so far, bottom fishers have not done well. Expect more of the same going forward.
Disclosure: none
Related Articles
|
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Trading Center
- Free E-Newsletters
- About Seeking Alpha
- About Us
- Contact Us
- What's New
- Readers Feedback
- Advertise With Us
- Contributors
- Contribute an Article
- Feature Your Book
- Our Contributors
- Anonymous Contributions
- Dispute an Article?
- Legal
- Terms of Use
- Privacy
- Copyright
This article has 4 comments:
- jegan ;-)
- 687 Comments
Aug 20 02:48 PMITU (Brazil) Seems to be coming off a low and looks like it might have 25% upside within a 3 month period. It is also on an uptrend. Watch it though. Brazil has a lot of commodity exposure...But it also has a booming internal economy - unlike (err...hack..cough..) the US.
IBN (India). I'd let it come back up through $28, for what might be a potential double. (Don't buy it now... It's dropping again.) Although India has a lot of problems with infrastructure and barricading itself against outside forces, it could be a nice growth story.
I'd also look at a nice stop just below the recent lows on either..
jegan ;-)
- Ames Tiedeman
- 702 Comments
My Website
Aug 21 08:12 AMStay away from all of these names.
- Tinman
- 45 Comments
My Website
Sep 15 03:48 PMSTD?
- Fliujniligui
- 14 Comments
Nov 23 11:16 AMMore by Edward Harrison