Zubin Jelveh

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article
  • Font Size:
  • Print

We know that Wal-Mart (WMT) and China help the poor by keeping inflationary pressures low on the prices of goods those in the lower income brackets consume. But that benefit is being offset by rising food and energy prices.

In new work, Chicago Fed economist Leslie McGranahan finds the six percent rise in food prices in the U.S. over the last year (July '07 to July '08) has had the largest impact on the poor.

One reason for this is that the poor spend a larger portion of their budgets on food than those with higher incomes:

food_price_1.gif

Another reason is that the poor eat out less, and the prices of foods that are consumed at home have risen faster than restaurant prices -- 7.1 percent versus 4.6 percent. Overall, McGranahan finds that those in the bottom 25 percent and those receiving food stamps have been hurt the most. Food-price inflation for the bottom 25 percent is at 6.3 percent compared with 5.8 percent for those in the top 25 percent. For food stamp recipients, food-price inflation is at 6.4 percent. The difference between rich and poor is wider when total inflation is considered: 6.0 percent versus 5.2 percent.

food_price_2.gif

It's worth noting that when food-price inflation is low, poorer households experience less food-price and overall inflation for the same reasons as above.

McGranahan's findings are similar to those by UBS economists in July who found that since 2000, "the lowest-income Americans consumers have seen their price index rise by over 7% more than the highest-income American consumers."

This article has 7 comments:

  •  
    Sep 05 03:50 PM
    Duh!!!
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 06 12:04 PM
    does this expert take into consideration the shrinking of weights & measures of food? or is it just price?
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 06 03:57 PM
    More money for the same amount of food, or the same amount of money for less food - what's the difference?

    Howard - your comment is perfect.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 06 04:28 PM
    more money for less food is different than more mone for the same amt of food-Ithink?
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 06 05:32 PM
    notsosmart - you are correct, but that is not what I wrote.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 06 07:29 PM
    anyway the poor always get hurt no matter what happens.my parents told me over & over-rich or poor its good to have money.
    Reply
  •  
    Sep 08 12:48 PM
    I was at the grocery store this weekend behind a food stamp recipient. The family was a man, woman, and three children under 5. They paid $2.56 for an overflowing grocery basket of food.

    I don't get food stamps, because I work. My basket was $123.94.

    So who's getting hurt worse--the food stamp recipient (who's subsidized for 90+% of their food budget) or the working stiff who doesn't qualify for food stamps?

    A year ago, my basket would have cost me less than $100. It looks to me like my food costs are up more than 20%.

    It's hard to imagine how a food stamp recipient can spend less than $2.56 on a grocery basket.
    Reply
Articles on related themes