Credit Suisse Group (CS)

All Comments on CS

  • commenter
    messy
    Aug 24 06:47 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    It seems that Citigroup plays dirty ever since Japan kicked them out for doing business there, and now they are after Wall Street brokers. Reply
  • commenter
    Jimmy
    Lathrop
    Aug 22 10:08 PM
    My Website
    Financial Services Authority Unhurried by Price Obviousness [view article]
    Sounds like some banker has a photograph of a politician in bed with a live boy or a dead girl. At least in a dictatorship there is less hypocrisy. Reply
  • commenter
    OldLimey
    Aug 22 11:25 AM
    Are Fundamentals Really Driving the Currency Markets? [view article]
    Re ideas 1-5: how about adding a sixth - hedge funds drop 2 and 20 to 1 and 10. (Limited period offer, of course, just while stocks - or should that be Funds - last.)

    Re the USD: it certainly didn't feel like a move based on fundamentals, but it's always good to have feelings backed by some high-powered (if proprietary) technical wizadry. Where did I put those kiwis...     Reply
  • commenter
    nayr
    Aug 21 10:49 AM
    My Website
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    yeah, I am in there on the short side (although hedged) on CRM. Thanks for the heads up!

    trade details here concisetrading.blogspo.../
    Ryan     Reply
  • commenter
    venividivici
    Aug 21 10:46 AM
    Rumor Sourcing of the Day - Lehman/Credit Suisse [view article]
    What's happened to you, Felix? Are you running out of things to write about? Reply
  • commenter
    SA Editor
    Eli Hoffmann
    Aug 21 10:31 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Hi Lee99. According to Bloomberg it was a miss:

    www.bloomberg.com/apps...

    Shares are down 4%, so FWIW it seems that's how the market is taking it too.     Reply
  • commenter
    notsosmart
    Aug 21 10:06 AM
    My Website
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    nobody has figured out a way to pave over the ocean. i am a veryhappy fro owner.yield app.18%.my dividends almost paid for the stock.lol @ analysts. Reply
  • commenter
    Lee99
    Aug 21 09:52 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    re FRO earnings: company reported $4.25, highest qty ever. Where does your $2.18 originate? Reply
  • commenter
    SA Editor
    Eli Hoffmann
    Aug 21 09:13 AM
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Thanks kkin365. They are alphabetized by company name. Do you mean by ticker? Reply
  • commenter
    kkin365
    Aug 21 08:50 AM
    My Website
    Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [view article]
    Excellent coverage as usual. Suggest that you alphabetize earnings report (after close and before open as 2 groups, as now) to facilitate reading. Reply
  • commenter
    Ames
    Tiedeman
    Aug 21 08:12 AM
    My Website
    Finding Relative Value in Financial Services [view article]
    All of your relative value plays go lower. The financials are melting down again.
    Stay away from all of these names.     Reply
  • commenter
    John Egan
    Aug 20 02:48 PM
    Finding Relative Value in Financial Services [view article]
    Certainly hope you're wearing shoes while you're out there wading around in the murky swamp of financials. Wouldn't want to see you step on anything nasty and squishy. Having said that, I'd be looking elsewhere...

    ITU (Brazil) Seems to be coming off a low and looks like it might have 25% upside within a 3 month period. It is also on an uptrend. Watch it though. Brazil has a lot of commodity exposure...But it also has a booming internal economy - unlike (err...hack..cough..) the US.

    IBN (India). I'd let it come back up through $28, for what might be a potential double. (Don't buy it now... It's dropping again.) Although India has a lot of problems with infrastructure and barricading itself against outside forces, it could be a nice growth story.

    I'd also look at a nice stop just below the recent lows on either..

    jegan ;-)     Reply
  • commenter
    tuskagee
    Aug 17 09:49 AM
    An Evaluation of the SEC’s Prohibition on Naked Short Selling [view article]
    To put it shortly, it takes a long time to grow a tree and only a few minutes to chop it down.... Reply
  • commenter
    tuskagee
    Aug 17 09:45 AM
    An Evaluation of the SEC’s Prohibition on Naked Short Selling [view article]
    The 'Short and Distort' artists we see destroying the market and companies today are basically supported by organized crime. Buying a quantity of puts beyond which are needed to protect long positions actually held should be prohibited. Naked shorting should have NEVER been allowed, even for market makers and their ilk. Offshore hedge funds seem to think they can operate with impunity from the balmy blue of the Carribean. Local sleezemeisters think they can do so due to SEC oblivion. In the process of shorting, naked or otherwise, the legitimate dreams of many law abiding investors have gone down the toilet. There was a time when investors had faith in companies and trusted that companies would do well over time, despite market perturbations. This healthy confidence has been usurped by liars, cheats, and thieving rumor-mongers who shout 'Fire' in a crowded theatre. The SEC simply must stop this and also reinstitute the uptick rule so normal investors have at least some scintilla of a chance. Reply
  • commenter
    trendsrus
    Aug 15 07:29 PM
    An Evaluation of the SEC’s Prohibition on Naked Short Selling [view article]
    Maybe actually reading the information contained in the study by Arturo Bris would help? The study claims that the stocks in question did worse than others and they did. The caveat that all seem to overlook is that the period the study covers is the first half of the year. Well of course the stocks in question performed worse in the period PRIOR to the emergency order --that is why they were put on protection from the naked short onslaught... Reply

Trading Center


Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links: