jbmaria

comments110
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
110 Comments

    • Thu Oct 9th 20:39 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Examining the "Unprecedented Demand" for Gold Eagle Coins
      Things I don't know:

      Where does the Mint get the gold-Fort Knox? On the open market?

      Who's watching the gold in Fort Knox? Do citizens get to know how much is there,does the amount stored rise and fall and if so how?
      Heard crazy rumors the Gv't. is not letting us know that we have little gold left in Ft. Knox-any chance?

      No,I don't wear tin foil hats-just curious.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 23rd 23:58 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      S&P Upgrades E*Trade Despite Struggling Financial Sector Peers
      Ah,those fickle analysts:

      S&P REDUCES RECOMMENDATION ON SHARES OF E TRADE FINANCIAL TO SELL FROM HOLDFont size: A | A | A
      5:58 PM ET 7/22/08 | S&P Marketscope
      RELATED QUOTES


      4:00 PM ET 7/23/08
      Symbol Last % Chg
      ETFC
      3.41 -15.80%
      Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes

      Q2 loss from continuing operations of $0.24 vs. EPS of $0.37 is wider than our $0.15 loss estimate. Loss provision for home equity portfolio was wider than we expected and credit quality declined, while losses on security sales offset better net interest margin and cost controls. Losses from investments in the GSEs will hurt Q3 results, but capital raised from other asset sales may offset. Net account growth also slowed. We widen our '08 loss estimate widens to $0.65 from $0.49, but keep target price at $3, a discount to a declining projected book value as writedowns continue.

      View article »
    • Wed Jul 23rd 21:21 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Countering the AP's 'E*Trade Financial Earnings Preview'
      Cindy ,you wrote this convoluted paragraph;

      "Bank Earnings Exceed Mortgage Losses: In their June 30, 2008 press release, E*Trade announced that it has been able to “generate earnings in the Bank to absorb credit losses in excess of management’s current three-year forecast.” E*Trade investor relations has confirmed multiple times that the word “EXCESS” in this statement is related to the earnings and not to the losses. In other words, in is wrong to interpret this as saying losses are in excess of management’s forecast; the validated disclosure from this message from E*Trade Management is that earnings are exceeding losses."

      Do we need a retraction in light of earnings or am I just misreading it?
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 23rd 21:10 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Countering the AP's 'E*Trade Financial Earnings Preview'
      Cindy,didn't you base an entire polemic on an S&P upgrade?

      S&P REDUCES RECOMMENDATION ON SHARES OF E TRADE FINANCIAL TO SELL FROM HOLDFont size: A | A | A
      5:58 PM ET 7/22/08 | S&P Marketscope
      RELATED QUOTES


      4:00 PM ET 7/23/08
      Symbol Last % Chg
      ETFC
      3.41 -15.80%
      Quotes delayed at least 15 minutes

      Q2 loss from continuing operations of $0.24 vs. EPS of $0.37 is wider than our $0.15 loss estimate. Loss provision for home equity portfolio was wider than we expected and credit quality declined, while losses on security sales offset better net interest margin and cost controls. Losses from investments in the GSEs will hurt Q3 results, but capital raised from other asset sales may offset. Net account growth also slowed. We widen our '08 loss estimate widens to $0.65 from $0.49, but keep target price at $3, a discount to a declining projected book value as writedowns continue.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 30th 20:01 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      Well Cindy,all your "good friends" on the ETFC board seem to be missing you?

      messages.finance.yahoo...
      View article »
    • Sun Jun 29th 23:01 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      seekingalpha.com/artic...



      ......"A Final Word of Caution
      Those of you looking to make easy money in the financials like E-Trade (ETFC) need to think again. The risk is too high right now. I find it amazing how so many who have taken a long position in ETFC cite the company's impressive book value as some sign of value or financial strength.Understand that book value is used in the event of liquidation of assets in bankruptcy and therefore usually has no impact for common stock holders. In addition, book values of financials are meaningless since the banks have overvalued their debt. Finally, book values typically have no way of fully accounting for the type of massive leverage the banks have built.If you were not aware of these basic facts, you really need to sit this one out, save your cash and wait for the next bull market, when nearly everyone does well.

      Even Citibank (C) has considerable downside from here, as does Bank of America (BAC). Over the past year, I have made many recommendations to short the financials. Earlier in the year, my attention was focused on Lehman Brothers (LEH) and American International Group (AIG). The story on these guys is far from over but I would wait for a rally before going short again.

      The next short to consider will be Merrill Lynch (MER). When MBIA (MBI) and Ambac (ABK) get another downgrade, Merrill will be in deep trouble due to their large exposure to insured mortgage debt. That said, you might be wondering why Merrill is already near a year low. It's quite simple. All that I have told you about Merrill's risks is widely known. But that does not mean it can't go lower. However, unless you are very experienced with shorting, you need to stay away from this strategy.

      Will there ever be a time to pick up the financials? I doubt I will bother to pick up any of these (other than for short-term trading) even when I sense the bottom has been reached because the climb back up is going to be very slow and small. The dilution that has and will continue to occur will crush earnings for many years."

      View article »
    • Sun Jun 29th 22:46 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      Looks like they ban on negative ETFC articles may be lifting?

      seekingalpha.com/artic...
      View article »
    • Tue Jun 24th 15:18 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      For the record let's post the "complete" S&P ratings revision as opposed to Cindy's condensed version:

      "➤ ETFC is in the midst of restructuring its opera-
      tions and balance sheet to focus on its retail
      clients and reduce its exposure to consumer
      lending and securities investments. While we
      view the decision to refocus on its core compe-
      tencies as prudent, we believe significant dam-
      age to its balance sheet and future earnings
      power has already taken place. While customer
      and asset defections have likely stabilized, we
      expect higher loan loss provisions, further im-
      pairments, and dilution from its capital infusion
      to constrain results for the foreseeable future.
      ➤ Despite the problems with its mortgage hold-
      ings and security investments, ETFC continues
      to post relatively strong retail results, with
      strong net new customer growth and daily av-
      erage revenue trades (DARTs) up 12%, year to
      year, in the first quarter. However, we see a
      number of negative headwinds in 2008, includ-
      ing continued loss provisions on its first lien
      and home equity portfolio, higher debt expense
      and increased customer acquisition costs.
      ➤ We project a loss per share of $0.49 in 2008 be-
      fore a return to profitability in 2009 with EPS of
      $0.16.
      ➤ We believe ETFC's past decision to stray from
      its core direct retail customer focus will be a
      drag on results for a number of quarters. While
      we view the move to realign operations to fo-
      cus on core retail customers as prudent, we
      see the overhang from its remaining mortgage
      assets and the dilutive capital infusion out-
      weighing the near-term positives that we have
      seen in its retail metrics. We anticipate further
      write-downs in the home equity loan portfolio in
      2008 and increased loan loss provisions for first
      lien holdings. While we see Citadel's invest-
      ment providing ETFC with much needed capital
      and balance sheet stability, we view the terms
      as unfavorable to existing shareholders.
      ➤ Risks to our opinion and target price include in-
      creased price competition in the retail busi-
      ness, higher interest rates, and smaller write-
      downs in the remaining mortgage portfolio.
      ➤ We arrive at our 12-month target price of $4.00
      by applying a 0.8X multiple to ETFC's 12-month
      projected book value per share, a discount to
      peers. We think a discount is warranted by un-
      certainties surrounding ETFC's mortgage and
      securities exposure and a challenging market. "
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 23rd 20:16 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      OK,Cindy,you don't want to talk about Layton and Enron,what about his compensation?

      On 3-2-08,the day he's named CEO,
      1.8 million shares land in his account and no one mentions it as compensation???
      Doesn't look like they're options but maybe they're restricted?
      Wondering if I missed a filing detailing this?

      biz.yahoo.com/t/28/382...



      View article »
    • Sun Jun 22nd 13:11 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      ...."thats makes me "queasy" (not in 1999 right now in 2008)".

      Sorry for your delicate condition,try a bromo, but my questions are valid and relevant.Cindy is writing pump pieces,cherry picking only the best looking data to sell her position.
      Simple example,Cindy cites the S&P upgrade and quotes the analyst who sees signs of stability but conveniently leaves out that S&P simply went from sell to hold and set a target of $4,about where the stock was when the upgrade came out. Then she focuses on the BMO guy raising the target to $6. I ask why the BMO analyst who got it so wrong last year should be trusted now? That's in addition to conveniently leaving out Layton's little brush with scandal while asking readers to buy into his pronouncements and not acknowedging he was not the first choice for CEO and hasn't helped the stock price.

      Cindy is on record on the yahoo board of planning this series of pump pieces in collusion with other well known pumpers. Readers should know that. I'll keep pointing out to the unsuspecting what she's doing,the record of pump pieces here is clear:

      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      on Jun 20, 2008 about AMTD, ETFC, SCHW
      S&P Upgrades E*Trade Despite Struggling Financial Sector Peers
      on Jun 12, 2008 about ETFC
      E*Trade's 'First In, First Out' Position: Yes, 111M Shorts Can Be Wrong
      on Jun 11, 2008 about ETFC
      Citadel Infuses E*Trade with Strong, Experienced Management
      on May 29, 2008 about ETFC
      Who Will Trigger E*Trade's Magic Moment - and a 111.4M Short Squeeze?
      on May 29, 2008 about ETFC
      Seeking E*Trade's 'Magic Moment'
      on May 23, 2008 about ETFC
      E*Trade: What the Analysts and News Haven't Told You
      on May 22, 2008 about ETFC
      Schwab, E*Trade: Monthly Activity Comparison and the Industry Average
      on May 15, 2008 about ETFC, SCHW
      E*Trade's Annual Shareholder Meeting Should Pressure the Shorts
      on May 09, 2008 about ETFC
      Comparative Price Shopping: Selected Banking, Mortgage and Brokerage Stocks
      on Apr 21, 2008 about BSC, CFC, ETFC
      E*Trade: Primed To Turn Around?
      on Apr 18, 2008 about AMTD, ETFC, SCHW
      View article »
    • Sun Jun 22nd 00:51 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      Well,that's it I guess.
      I've been dismissed by Queen Cindy.
      If there's anyone still reading this dreck I suppose I'll just let you figure it out.
      View article »
    • Sun Jun 22nd 00:13 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      Cindy,you can try to change the topic until you're blue in the face BUT readers would want to know how you could have missed the Layton/Enron connection whether he's guilty or not.
      You claim the man is a brilliant paragon of virtue but you left out the reason many believe he retired from a job paying $15mill./a year-it's relevant.
      It your ineptitude that's being questioned,not his.
      View article »
    • Sat Jun 21st 23:49 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      I thinking our Cindy isn't quite ready for prime time:

      messages.finance.yahoo...
      View article »
    • Sat Jun 21st 23:07 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      So Cindy,you seem reluctant to discuss Layton and Enron???
      Perhaps because there's only two logical conclusions,you left it out intentionally since it didn't fit your thesis (you lied by omission) or your research skills are severely absent or biased?????

      Anyway,pumpers are always citing Layton's pay package being tied to performance.That's true enough but there are some other ways to look at it.
      Layton's got his $1million stock buy back and plenty more with any luck at all.That buy of stock was IMHO, a down payment on the job he wanted and not a big amount to him,he earned $15 million total compensation his last year at JPM. If he hadn't been appointed CEO of ETFC he might have walked and sold his tiny stake-not much of a risk on his part.He's pretty well covered as I see it.
      But below is the language from the SEC filing describing his ETFC CEO compensation:

      "Mr. Layton will receive an annual base salary of $1,000,000, and the Company granted to Mr. Layton stock options and restricted stock, which will vest on a quarterly basis through 2009 and have an initial aggregate value of approximately $15.4 million (with the value for the stock options based on an option valuation methodology and for restricted stock based on the intrinsic value on the grant date). Mr. Layton and the Company will enter into an employment agreement with a term through 2009, which will provide for no further equity grants and no opportunity for any cash bonuses during the term. Under the employment agreement, if Mr. Layton is terminated without cause, or if after a change in control, he resigns for "good reason" (as defined in the Company's previously filed form of executive employment agreement), he will receive a severance payment of $5 million and accelerated vesting of his equity awards. He will not receive separate compensation as Chairman or as a director."

      Is it possible that even if Layton presided over the sale of ETFC for only $1/share,he'd still get a $5m bonus and restricted shares could still be granted to him then????? That seems to be the way it reads?
      View article »
    • Fri Jun 20th 20:18 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts
      '"I AM QUEASY." Complex deals involving cash advances raised concerns with JP Morgan Vice-Chairman Donald H. Layton. "We are making disguised loans, usually buried in commodities or equities derivatives (and I'm sure in other areas)..." Layton wrote in an internal 1999 e-mail to credit-risk managers that was introduced as evidence in the trial. (Parenthetic remark in previous sentence is Layton's.) He also wrote: "I am queasy about the process."'

      Legally,he's guilty only of wondering out loud if something funny was going on.We're not holding him to the highest standards here,a real "boy scout" might have made some real noise.But I'm adult enough to know how biz works and also smart enough to think this is a small negative for a CEO running a co. I invest in.
      If nothing else,it shows at least a little willingness to play ball with others to cover up shady stuff.
      There was talk he retired early over this smear but how do you nail that down-you can't.

      View article »