kebu77

Total Rating:
+1 / 0

56 Comments

    • Mon Nov 17th 12:41 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Pickens Plan Changes Its Strategy
      Picken's plan and most other energy proposals deal with expanding supply of alternative fuels (batteries, CNG/LNG, LPG, H2, etc.) to accommodate decreasing supply of oil-based fuels. No one seriously addresses "negawatts" and other demand-side solutions to the energy crisis.

      Not good enough.

      We need to save energy in a hurry due to general oil depletion issues and for national security. The single largest energy efficiency / conservation option (with the possible exception of improving the energy efficiency of buildings) is to expand and electrify the freight railroads. (Passenger can follow, but freight now is critical.)

      Diesel-electric rail transport is 10X more efficient that big rigs, not counting the savings on road maintenance and public safety from getting the big rigs off the road - - and electrified rail is double that. Rail saves so much energy that using coal-fired electricity to run trains reduces CO2 emissions compared to NG-powered trucks (gasoline and diesel are not even in the running).

      Between the Civil War and 1905, America expanded the rail network from about 30,000 miles to 240,000 miles. The current network is a little over half that, due the the transition to trucking that came when we switched from a coal to an oil economy, and the largest use of rail is transport of bulk commodities (e.g., coal mine to power plant).

      An added effort should be made to expand water transport of goods, incl. river/canal/coastal traffic and more shipping of Asian goods to Gulf and E. Coast ports via Panama Canal vs. Trucking from W. Coast Ports.

      The diesel saved can go in part to ensuring that shortages of home heating fuel do not occur during the transition of building heating to geothermal heat pumps and other non-oil heating sources.

      The International Energy Agency is finally coming around to the reality that an energy crunch is upon us with the end of cheap oil. (Even now, oil is not cheap @ 4X its 1998 low and 3X its 2002 low.)

      This July The Oil Drum, theoildrum.com, published a detailed proposal by Alan Drake, a proponent of expanded and electrified rail, which can be found at www.theoildrum.com/nod.... Mr. Drake's dedication to the national interest come thru in every word.

      The expanded rail network in the 19th century converted the US into a truly national ecomony by the end of the century. The relative impact of that effort was greater than the construction of the interstate highway system. (An anecdote tells the tale: the 1906 SF earthquake was about as devistating as Hurricane Katrina was on NOLA, but a much smaller country was able to provide what some have commented was more effective and timely relief from all over the country via rail.)

      A government effort to support and guide the reconstruction of our freight rail system is needed now.
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 7th 12:58 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Deflation Debate: Why This Time Is Different
      Does all the money held by the top dogs in the oil-producing countries change any of the views expressed above?

      What happens when the Treasury (soon) goes into the bond market in a big way, if there are shortage of buyers?

      If rates on long issues then rise substantially to attract the extra cash needed? If the dollar then drops fast and oil and other commodities rise fast... just after OPEC has (on or before their Dec meeting) cut quotas again, triggering an unintended second oil price spike?
      View article »
    • Thu Nov 6th 11:33 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Negative Sentiment on Crude Oil Overdone - First Energy Analyst
      Mr. King could actually be a little pessimistic himself, if James Kingsdale and others are right in thinking that recent Saudi over-production was to get McCain in and continue the Bush policies re (Shiite) Iraq and Iran.

      KSA seems to have figured out prior to the election it wasn't gonna happen, and started their cut-backs some time ago (not that the price crash didn't have something to do with it).

      This latest production burst is like past times when they produced way over quota coincidentally during politically interesting periods, like Spring-Fall '04 to give Bush a boost, with the difference that, now, they probably want to cut back for geological reasons like letting over-worked fields rest.

      The fear here is that all the OPEC producers will cut back too much and create another price cycle, but at a minimum, oil could "pop back up to $80 to $90" by the end of the year.
      View article »
    • Thu Nov 6th 11:12 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Purchase Applications Support Housing Sector’s Weakness
      Obama wants to make energy his top priority.

      Home builders might get together and propose a massive effort to make existing buildings more energy efficient. Nega-watts are better than coal-fired power plants.

      Same for the commercial construction industry.
      View article »
    • Thu Nov 6th 10:48 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Day After: Is the Honeymoon Already Over?
      Bush I and Clinton were fiscally responsible (tax increases and, for Clinton, working with a Repub cong). Bush II ran the country into a ditch, as Ross Perot would say.

      Obama has said he would make energy his top priority. Pickens isn't finished talking, either. Given the liquidity trap possibilities and the credit crunch, he and his advisers may rightly conclude that direct investments in energy, infrastructure, and mil and non-mil goods are needed.

      One suggestion is to identify and down-size aging fed, state and local govt cars and trucks. Buy American, possibly as part of a larger program to keep GM-Ford-Chrys. in the game. Park the old ones and parcel them into the auction markets over a couple of years...

      Best hopes for optimal bipartisan actions to address the crises now and after 1/20.
      View article »
    • Tue Nov 4th 13:08 PM | Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      Why TARP Has Failed
      " '....Assessing the value of mortgage-backed securities [MBSs] requires scrutinizing mortgages down to the level of individual ZIP Codes.....' As both Markowitz and I have argued, we need good information on these portfolios.... [S]ecurities have to be painstakingly analyzed by valuing each of their components, a process that could take months or longer. The market, however, may not wait for such analysis to be performed...."

      Take out the trash.

      An intermediary needs to be introduced and rules imposed to get a much quicker MBSs valuations than "months or longer" and to do loan mods on targeted mortgages of primary residences in reliance on results. If this involves legislation or regulation to modify MBS contracts, so be it. (Though, based purely on financial considerations, selected non-primary residential mortages might be included if a security holder notice-and-approval mechanism could be efficiently implemented.)

      The goal is to get marketable valuations quickly and re-liquidify the MBS market.


      Sheila Bair's current "class action" loan-mod exercise re IndyMac is being rendered ineffective because only mortgages not bundled into MBSs are included and her model is unable to drill down to outcome comparisons based on probable losses arising from foreclosure (thus no meaningful compromise of principal as a part of work-outs and too high an income threshold for participation).

      If a minimum baseline, separate from any given delinquent or at-risk mortgage, can be set, then the Bair approach can be expanded and made more efficient.

      The $700B bailout bill was originally advertised as being mainly for buying MBSs to improve bank liquidity, help homebuyers, and establish a real-value bottom to house prices (rather than an "undershoot" based on excess foreclosures and real, measureable harm to neighborhoods).

      But Bait and Switch happened. If nothing meaningful happens on relief for homebuyers/house prices, the Hill will move on bankruptcy reform. I think bankruptcy reform is needed anyway, but it will surely occur if there is no alternative option out there.
      View article »
    • Mon Nov 3rd 11:37 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Housing Affordability Close to 4-Year High in September
      How many median income familys have 20% to put down? If the NAR also ran HAI numbers for 5% down and 10% down, figured with the higher interest rates that come with lower FICOs and higher LTVs, with PMI added in, then a fuller picture might emerge.

      In the short run, thru next spring, mortgage interest rates are likely to rise with rising 10-yr treasuries. In addition we are seeing record suspensions in 401k contributions (even as consumption drops) which will result in increased income taxes, draining further from disposable income.
      View article »
    • Fri Oct 31st 12:40 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Home Ownership Bubble
      Homeowner - - free and clear

      Homebuyer - - some debt

      Renter - - under water
      View article »
    • Thu Oct 30th 14:07 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      15 More Thoughts on the Current Crisis
      A snip from the article - -

      "[T]he only way to cure it is through expedited bankruptcy procedures."

      Why not the same for homeowners? Justifiable loan mods in both the interests of lenders/investors and homeowners are being frustrated by the structural barriers of the current system, including lender-servicer arrangements skewed in favor of servicers that promote foreclosures over meaningful work-outs that let folks stay in their homes.
      View article »
    • Thu Oct 30th 13:46 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Hottest Potato in Washington: The Homeowner Bailout Plan
      The limits on labor market mobility imposed by our broken health care "system" are currently compounded by the inability or unwillingness of many workers to SELL THEIR HOMES and relocate to (better) jobs.

      Balance the interests of these workers (and of their employers in an efficient labor market) with those of the lenders and security holders by amending the bankruptcy code to allow insolvent people living in their homes to get loan mods in bankruptcy. This will help all homeowners by getting to the housing price bottom quicker (more folks stay in their homes and fewer REOs compete with regular existing home sales).

      Lenders are not the only members of the business class.

      Case-by-case adjudication and settlements from the bottom up would ripple thru the system and help correct the current structural barriers that are hindering loan mods in tens (hundreds?) of thousands of cases where - - but for the financial interests servicers and their law firms have in properties going to foreclosure vs. work-outs - - mods are in the financial interests of the lenders.

      Not to mention how destructive to communities are the walk-aways, short-sales, deeds-in-lieu, foreclosures, cash-for-keys, and evictions...

      There is no one silver bullet. A diversity of top-down and bottom-up solutions are needed.

      View article »
    • Thu Oct 30th 13:30 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bailout, Schmailout
      The limits on labor market mobility imposed by our broken health care "system" are currently compounded by the inability or unwillingness of many workers to SELL THEIR HOMES and relocate to (better) jobs.

      Balance the interests of these workers (and of their employers in an efficient labor market) with those of the lenders and security holders by amending the bankruptcy code to allow insolvent people living in their homes to get loan mods in bankruptcy.

      Lenders are not the only members of the business class.

      Case-by-case adjudication and settlements from the bottom up would ripple thru the system and help correct the current structural barriers that are hindering loan mods in tens of thousands of cases where - - but for the financial interests servicers and their law firms have in properties going to foreclosure vs. work-outs - - mods are in the financial interests of the lenders.

      Not to mention how destructive to communities are the walk-aways, short-sales, deeds-in-lieu, foreclosures, cash-for-keys, and evictions...
      View article »
    • Thu Oct 30th 12:59 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Corporate America Is Inadvertently Helping Obama
      Notes on the 13 Keys - -

      1. They predict a popular vote "win" - - not the deciding electoral vote count. This time around, so many keys are flipped, that a "split decision" like 2000 is a black swan.

      2. The model is very robust, surviving civil war, world wars, and the depression. The EEO identity of a candidate is such a small blip (Bradley effect to the contrary notwithstanding) as to be irrelevant (model makers would probably say, the dynamic of the keys has already discounted for this, e.g., the protracted primary season).

      3. The model is based on a political system that is based on our Constitution and the "meme" of economic growth that have co-existed since the founding. Theoretically the model could be upset on one of three ways - -

      a. Most improbable, a radical change in the 148-yr old two-party system, without a radical change in the Constitution or economy;

      b. Less improbable, but still unlikely, by constitutional amendment, such as elimination of the "natural-born citizen" requirement or repeal of two-term limit.

      c. Possible: An energy crash drives a prolonged period of economic contraction, giving the two keys based on economic conditions a new interpretation... If the peakists are right, 2012 may be the last election we can play this parlor trick. ;-(
      View article »
    • Thu Oct 30th 12:34 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Corporate America Is Inadvertently Helping Obama
      According to Allan Lichtman's "13 Keys to the Presidency", the fix has been in for a dem in the WH since October '07. His model based on the current 2-party system elections from 1860-1980, has successfully predicted every election since. (This is really good political science, folks.)

      The only issue at this point is how long the coat tails are. With the avalanche of bad econ news, helped by a conviction here and a scandal there, the tails could be surprisingly long.

      Boone was on CNBC this a.m., you could tell he was looking forward to a new energy deal. Robini was testifying on the Hill this a.m., sticking to his view of an 18-24 month deep L recession and long jobless recovery...
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 29th 17:23 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      World Oil Supplies Declining Faster Than Expected - IEA
      "...the natural annual rate of output decline is 9.1 per cent, the International Energy Agency says..."

      The IEA is a political organization better named "the Organization of Oil Importing Countries." They have been telegraphing this shift in assessment for months. It is a 180-degree turnaround from their cornucopian views up to a couple of years ago. Before, their basic view was, "If you project the demand, it will be supplied" - - no science, no real analysis.

      Pay attention, now. They have been bitten by reality, but it will be a year or two before they can tell the whole truth, because it will be too shocking to tell all at once. (The IEA's masters are all politicians, an excitable group.)

      The full FT article includes this: "It expects oil consumption in 2030 to reach 106.4m barrels a day, down from last year’s forecast of 116.3m b/d." This is not the first time the IEA has cut back its future production forecast, and it won't be the last.

      As the IEA continues to (downward) revise its stats, keep in mind that oil available for export is dropping faster than total oil produced as the oil rich countries expand their internal consumption. (Jeffrey Brown's "Export Land Model")
      View article »
    • Wed Oct 29th 13:40 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Real HOPE for Homeowners
      H4H = BS. Due to the structural impediments, conflict-of-interest between servicers and lenders, and reluctance of lenders to cooperate, nothing like 400,000 homeowners will be "helped".

      When commercial loans go bad, they often get reworked and no one gets all moralistic about it, even though the commercial borrowers are in a much more informed position at closing on a loan.

      The bankruptcy code should be amended to let borrowers who live in the homes, and who become insolvent due to adversity (business set-back, lost job, major medical), get their loans re-worked in bankruptcy.

      This would help that unfortunate tier of live-ins just below the H4H group and would probably help the lenders in the short run due to the house price bottom happening quicker at a higher level and the remaining foreclosed homes selling at higher prices.
      View article »
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor