dubious

Total Rating:
+1 / -1

17 Comments

    • Wed Nov 19th 08:18 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Going for High Yield Stocks
      seems confused. you're only receiving a 20% yield on your portfolio if you bought all the stocks now at today's prices. your actual yield is probably less, based on the higher stock price when you selected the position, although still a fine idea and portfolio.
      View article »
    • Mon Nov 10th 15:48 PM | Rating: 0 -1
      Commented on:
      5 Energy Stocks with Low Long-Term Risk
      ....... he also ignores altogether the exodus from CanRoys to occur with the new Can tax law going into effect...........
      View article »
    • Sun Nov 9th 14:20 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Nordic American Tanker Pays Off Yet Again
      I've been with NAT through good times and bad and the bad times aren't that bad. The CEO signals his moves with "Letters to the Shareholders" and CNBC interviews and practically pre-announces the div. And even if the 20% yield is cut in half that's still really good.
      View article »
    • Fri Nov 7th 08:14 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Seven Highest Yielding Stocks Going Ex Dividend in November
      I'm thinking NAT's div is higher, like over 18%. Plus, the price drops by the amount of the div on ex-div date and "may" not come back anytime soon.
      (the exdiv is announced, as the record date, when the div is announced so the forthcoming payment is a done deal. buy before exdiv date)
      View article »
    • Mon Oct 13th 09:11 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Some Stocks to Research for the Market Rebound
      ..."Further the promise of more offshore drilling in the U.S. in the near future seems very real these days"...
      Sorry, not true. The Dems put so many restrictions in the bill it won't happen, and they will reverse themselves and put off shore off limits again after the elections.
      View article »
    • Mon Oct 13th 08:53 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Is Gold A Sucker's Bet?
      ...."People around the world began melting their gold in response and selling it for scrap. ".....

      Really? Where's the evidence for that, the first of many false assumptions. The only comment of interest in the article is the point that under today's economic crisis, gold (if it is a safe haven) should be very much higher, and is not. The "safe haven theory" may be bunk.
      View article »
    • Tue Oct 7th 08:55 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Cramer: Dow Could Drop Another 14%, Oil's Going to $50
      how in the world can Cramer think Obama will magically find the qualities and experience needed to move us forward?
      View article »
    • Mon Sep 29th 08:44 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Bailout? Or Start Bailing?
      during an interview with CNBC 24sep08, barney frank said "we're capping executive compensation for those institutions coming to the fed govt for funding. Next year we'll expand it to all financial institutions." the dems already have a federal minimum wage law, now they are beginning a federal maximum wage law. be afraid, be very afraid...
      View article »
    • Sun Sep 28th 16:31 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Eight ETFs to Preserve Your Wealth
      "heading towards depression"????? we're not even officially in a recession yet. i wish guys like this were held to account when they're proven later to be so terribly wrong. just wait, if Obama's elected the story will change and everything will be roses. no change in reality, just a change in bias, and there's plenty of bias in this story.....
      View article »
    • Sat Sep 27th 22:19 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      FDIC Anoints Superbanks - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/26/08)
      once again cramer wants the government to bail the markets out because it's becoming too difficult for him to pick stocks. "there's always a bull market somewhere" unless you have to work for it.
      View article »
    • Wed Sep 24th 16:58 PM | Rating: +1 0
      Commented on:
      Nordic American Tanker: Dividend Stock Analysis
      wonder how long the shipping sector cash cow will last
      View article »
    • Thu Sep 4th 08:44 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
      Cramer does not know the Shipping Sector. Neither do show hosts on CNBC. I heard one confuse bulk shipping with containers coming out of China. Either the sector is too small, or they don't have contacts to interview, or they don't have access to shipping analysts in New York. I sometimes wonder what other sectors are great investments but we don't hear about them because Cramer and his cohorts don't follow them.
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 15th 09:50 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Forget $100 a Barrel - Oil Will Plummet to $30
      is it April's Fools Day already?? have you even considered China or India? do you think either are going to play nice for the environment? Basically, if oil and thus gas come down that much we'll all be in SUVs again and prices will rise. Supply and demand.
      View article »
    • Fri Aug 8th 11:59 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Shipping Stocks: I'd Wait To Buy Frontline and Overseas
      ... so don't buy the stocks, don't receive the very high dividends for three or four quarters while waiting for the price to come down someday maybe ........ and don't take gains during price spikes ........
      I guess I've been doing it wrong all these years.....
      View article »
    • Tue Jul 15th 10:45 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Unnatural Gas
      PaulK
      Politicians have been talking, but not producing results, for decades. The Dems alternative fuels solution is nothing new. I remember the first energy crisis in the early 70's when gas went from $.27 to $2.00/gal and we all thought certainly the world would end. That was the first time they changed the national speed limit to 55mph -- for awhile. I also remember all the promises for alternatives and solutions, the same we hear today; alternative fuels, electric cars, solar homes, passive solar, etc, etc. Forty years later we are not much closer to getting off oil. And for forty years, with whatever combination of Dem Pres/ Dem congress, Rep Pres/Dem congress, Rep P/Rep C, etc etc the govt. has never really pressed hard to work solutions. Sadly, they all have excuses for "not" doing something; 'we can't drill our way out' , 'we can't drill, it will be 10 years', 'they're not using the leases they have now', 'what about the baby polar bears and the beaches'. Seems T.B. Pickens is the only real man in the country. He's actually doing something, with his money. The politicians just wring the hands and do the Graham whine.
      Generally, societies fully exploit their own resources first before turning to other nations for trade, (or war). Our govt. has put up every roadblock imaginable to prevent drilling, coal use, or nuclear. It is our govts. policy to remain dependent on foreign oil. The govt wants you on mass transit, limited travel, smaller homes, no bbq grills, all driving the same small car or scooter. This saves the vital resources for the elites, but I'm not suggesting conspiracies.
      In the short term, the Dems will do nothing because it works to their advantage in Nov elections for Americans to suffer.
      View article »
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links:
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor

Transcripts

More Transcripts»